<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Landmarks45</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.landmarks45.org/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.landmarks45.org</link>
	<description>Celebrating 45 years of landmarking in New York City!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:37:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on June Madness by Little Sisters/Big Loss: Thoughts on Changing Tastes &#171; Landmarks45</title>
		<link>http://www.landmarks45.org/archives/166/comment-page-1#comment-14879</link>
		<dc:creator>Little Sisters/Big Loss: Thoughts on Changing Tastes &#171; Landmarks45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.landmarks45.org/?p=166#comment-14879</guid>
		<description>[...] Convent of the Little Sisters was a victim of the religious property wars and of stylistic prejudice.Â  The mid 1980s witnessed major clashes between those trying to [...]

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Convent of the Little Sisters was a victim of the religious property wars and of stylistic prejudice.Â  The mid 1980s witnessed major clashes between those trying to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brooklyn Heights Does it Right!! by Yes, more about Historic Districts! &#171; Landmarks45</title>
		<link>http://www.landmarks45.org/archives/115/comment-page-1#comment-10195</link>
		<dc:creator>Yes, more about Historic Districts! &#171; Landmarks45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.landmarks45.org/?p=115#comment-10195</guid>
		<description>[...] Battle for Historic Districts&#8221; is both a celebration of Martin Schneider&#8217;s new book on the struggle to protect Brooklyn Heights and a panel discussion on the future of historic [...]

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Battle for Historic Districts&#8221; is both a celebration of Martin Schneider&#8217;s new book on the struggle to protect Brooklyn Heights and a panel discussion on the future of historic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brooklyn Heights Does it Right!! by Memory and Research: Two Largely Unaddressed Preservation Needs &#171; Landmarks45</title>
		<link>http://www.landmarks45.org/archives/115/comment-page-1#comment-9292</link>
		<dc:creator>Memory and Research: Two Largely Unaddressed Preservation Needs &#171; Landmarks45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.landmarks45.org/?p=115#comment-9292</guid>
		<description>[...] the history of the Brooklyn Heights Historic District has been well captured.Â  Oral histories with Otis, his archival collection of documents from the multi-year effort to [...]

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the history of the Brooklyn Heights Historic District has been well captured.Â  Oral histories with Otis, his archival collection of documents from the multi-year effort to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Good Season to Think about our Landmark Houses of Worship and to Do Something for Them by A Sad Day/A Bright Future: The Austin, Nichols and Company Warehouse. &#171; Landmarks45</title>
		<link>http://www.landmarks45.org/archives/405/comment-page-1#comment-6406</link>
		<dc:creator>A Sad Day/A Bright Future: The Austin, Nichols and Company Warehouse. &#171; Landmarks45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.landmarks45.org/?p=405#comment-6406</guid>
		<description>[...] is an update from Landmark West! on the Volunteer clean up day at West-Park Presbyterian that I blogged about: &#8220;On Saturday, December 4th, more than 40 volunteers came together for a day of cleaning to [...]

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is an update from Landmark West! on the Volunteer clean up day at West-Park Presbyterian that I blogged about: &#8220;On Saturday, December 4th, more than 40 volunteers came together for a day of cleaning to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Celebrating and Protecting our Sagittarian Historic Districts! by Anthony C. Wood</title>
		<link>http://www.landmarks45.org/archives/414/comment-page-1#comment-6271</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony C. Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 16:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.landmarks45.org/?p=414#comment-6271</guid>
		<description>Talk about people lost in the past -when will the leadership of the Real Estate Board of New York abandon their tired old rhetoric and realize that historic preservation is economic development?  Steven Spinola states:  &quot;Landmarking the entire city does not leave opportunity to grow.&quot; Adding 790 buildings to the less than 3% of the city&#039;s tax lots that have been landmarked does not come close to landmarking the entire city. With 97% of the city not landmarked and hence, using Spinola&#039;s logic, still possessomg the opportunity to grow, he can calm down. It is time that the Real Estate Board of New York enter the 21st Century and realize that after having established a 45 year track record of success, preservation has established itself as a key ingredient to the future health of our city.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talk about people lost in the past -when will the leadership of the Real Estate Board of New York abandon their tired old rhetoric and realize that historic preservation is economic development?  Steven Spinola states:  &#8220;Landmarking the entire city does not leave opportunity to grow.&#8221; Adding 790 buildings to the less than 3% of the city&#8217;s tax lots that have been landmarked does not come close to landmarking the entire city. With 97% of the city not landmarked and hence, using Spinola&#8217;s logic, still possessomg the opportunity to grow, he can calm down. It is time that the Real Estate Board of New York enter the 21st Century and realize that after having established a 45 year track record of success, preservation has established itself as a key ingredient to the future health of our city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Celebrating and Protecting our Sagittarian Historic Districts! by Benjamin Baccash</title>
		<link>http://www.landmarks45.org/archives/414/comment-page-1#comment-6264</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Baccash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.landmarks45.org/?p=414#comment-6264</guid>
		<description>&#039;Others&#039; would also include REBNY&#039;s President Steven Spinola, just quoted in The Real Deal about the proposed extension of the Riverside-West End Historic District, saying &quot;By making this aggressive landmarking effort, [the LPC] will be hurting the economic future of the cityâ€¦ landmarking the entire city does not leave opportunity to grow,&quot;.  Incredible, although unfortunately not surprising coming from such an organization, that this kind of thinking persists.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Others&#8217; would also include REBNY&#8217;s President Steven Spinola, just quoted in The Real Deal about the proposed extension of the Riverside-West End Historic District, saying &#8220;By making this aggressive landmarking effort, [the LPC] will be hurting the economic future of the cityâ€¦ landmarking the entire city does not leave opportunity to grow,&#8221;.  Incredible, although unfortunately not surprising coming from such an organization, that this kind of thinking persists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on June Madness by A Good Season to Think about our Landmark Houses of Worship and to Do Something for Them &#171; Landmarks45</title>
		<link>http://www.landmarks45.org/archives/166/comment-page-1#comment-6012</link>
		<dc:creator>A Good Season to Think about our Landmark Houses of Worship and to Do Something for Them &#171; Landmarks45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 10:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.landmarks45.org/?p=166#comment-6012</guid>
		<description>[...] That triggered a struggle that ultimately led to the Supreme Court. As difficult and bitter as that struggle was, today finds a very different situation with St. Bartholomewâ€™s Church and the preservation [...]

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That triggered a struggle that ultimately led to the Supreme Court. As difficult and bitter as that struggle was, today finds a very different situation with St. Bartholomewâ€™s Church and the preservation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Grass Isn’t Greener: Everywhere Vigilance is the Price of Preservation by Rick Corrigan</title>
		<link>http://www.landmarks45.org/archives/389/comment-page-1#comment-5571</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Corrigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.landmarks45.org/?p=389#comment-5571</guid>
		<description>On my own behalf and as President of the Board of Charleston&#039;s oldest preservation organization, I wish to express my dismay and empathy to the Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation, and all like minded New Yorkers that the Commission charged with protecting buildings like 326 and 328 East 4th Street are not doing their job.  If the buildings are not doomed and if there is anything I can do to add a voice of concern, let me know.

Thank you for highlighting Chalreston&#039;s on going battle for simple requests of regulations for the cruise industry in our small harbor which is not only beautiful but a highly significant battleground of both the Revolutionary War and the War of 1861.  The photographs illustrate the problem very well.  The Carnival Cruise Line owns a huge fleet of ships in various sizes. They select large ones to dock here.  They are sailing out of every port on the SE and Gulf coasts except Savannah under their current busines plan.  The City and The SC State Ports Authority will not listen to the Coastal Conservation League (to my knowledge, the first group to sound the alarm on this issue), The Preservation Society, The Committee to Save the City, the Historic Ansonborough Neighbohood Association (the neighborhood of restored 18th and 19th century brick homes closest to the problem,) or scores of individual citizens who have voiced concerns.  They will not even discuss, in real terms, the concerns raised.  

These monster ships are the carnival come to town every couple of days. They tip the scale of living among thousands of visitors.  They disrupt traffic, hurt many businesses and destroy the skyline.  The city, identifiable by its church steeples, is gone much of the week. There is an outcry for regulation and tourism management.  These floating cities are the only form of tourism without any city regulation. 

My question to our friends in New York is what changed in the last 10 years to make our job even more difficult and how do we regain the momentum we have lost?  This is not to say that the vigilance you refer to, which echoes Jefferson&#039;s writings on freedom, was not always needed but the cruise ships, the destruction of 170 year old houses in Manhattan, and a number of other projects in Chaleston raise the question of what preservationists across the country need to do to get historic commisions, city officials and those charged with protecting the history and beauty of our nation back into the hands of historians and preservationists or, at least, poiticians, who are willing to listen.

Thank You Again,

Rick Corrigan, President of the Board of the Preservation Society of Charleston, celebrating our 90th year in 2010.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On my own behalf and as President of the Board of Charleston&#8217;s oldest preservation organization, I wish to express my dismay and empathy to the Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation, and all like minded New Yorkers that the Commission charged with protecting buildings like 326 and 328 East 4th Street are not doing their job.  If the buildings are not doomed and if there is anything I can do to add a voice of concern, let me know.</p>
<p>Thank you for highlighting Chalreston&#8217;s on going battle for simple requests of regulations for the cruise industry in our small harbor which is not only beautiful but a highly significant battleground of both the Revolutionary War and the War of 1861.  The photographs illustrate the problem very well.  The Carnival Cruise Line owns a huge fleet of ships in various sizes. They select large ones to dock here.  They are sailing out of every port on the SE and Gulf coasts except Savannah under their current busines plan.  The City and The SC State Ports Authority will not listen to the Coastal Conservation League (to my knowledge, the first group to sound the alarm on this issue), The Preservation Society, The Committee to Save the City, the Historic Ansonborough Neighbohood Association (the neighborhood of restored 18th and 19th century brick homes closest to the problem,) or scores of individual citizens who have voiced concerns.  They will not even discuss, in real terms, the concerns raised.  </p>
<p>These monster ships are the carnival come to town every couple of days. They tip the scale of living among thousands of visitors.  They disrupt traffic, hurt many businesses and destroy the skyline.  The city, identifiable by its church steeples, is gone much of the week. There is an outcry for regulation and tourism management.  These floating cities are the only form of tourism without any city regulation. </p>
<p>My question to our friends in New York is what changed in the last 10 years to make our job even more difficult and how do we regain the momentum we have lost?  This is not to say that the vigilance you refer to, which echoes Jefferson&#8217;s writings on freedom, was not always needed but the cruise ships, the destruction of 170 year old houses in Manhattan, and a number of other projects in Chaleston raise the question of what preservationists across the country need to do to get historic commisions, city officials and those charged with protecting the history and beauty of our nation back into the hands of historians and preservationists or, at least, poiticians, who are willing to listen.</p>
<p>Thank You Again,</p>
<p>Rick Corrigan, President of the Board of the Preservation Society of Charleston, celebrating our 90th year in 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Grass Isn’t Greener: Everywhere Vigilance is the Price of Preservation by Dana Beach</title>
		<link>http://www.landmarks45.org/archives/389/comment-page-1#comment-5510</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana Beach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.landmarks45.org/?p=389#comment-5510</guid>
		<description>Excellent coverage of the cruise ship debate in Charleston!  It is important to understand that Mayor Riley is the primary advocate for unrestricted cruise ship visitation in Charleston.  He has consistently opposed any enforceable limitations or environmental standards.  He has also stated that the cruise ships calling on Charleston are appropriate in scale for the city, not only the Carnival Fantasy, which is pictured above, but the Carnival Glory, which is almost twice as large as the Fantasy.  Unless Mayor Riley alters his position, it will be very difficult to protect the integrity of historic Charleston.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent coverage of the cruise ship debate in Charleston!  It is important to understand that Mayor Riley is the primary advocate for unrestricted cruise ship visitation in Charleston.  He has consistently opposed any enforceable limitations or environmental standards.  He has also stated that the cruise ships calling on Charleston are appropriate in scale for the city, not only the Carnival Fantasy, which is pictured above, but the Carnival Glory, which is almost twice as large as the Fantasy.  Unless Mayor Riley alters his position, it will be very difficult to protect the integrity of historic Charleston.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thanks to Commissioner Gratz and her Worthy Predecessors!! by Benjamin Baccash</title>
		<link>http://www.landmarks45.org/archives/368/comment-page-1#comment-5236</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Baccash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.landmarks45.org/?p=368#comment-5236</guid>
		<description>Another good post.  

The proposed project that you mention of cataloging past LPC Commissioners is a great idea and a necessary pursuit.  Perhaps a wiki would be a low-cost way to achieve this?  If not, maybe NYPAP will be able to work on this project at some point, or an independent preservationist will write a grant and pursue this.  

However this list is hopefully and eventually compiled, and as Tony Wood said, it would be a valuable record of the past, not to mention an instructive guide in anticipating the future.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another good post.  </p>
<p>The proposed project that you mention of cataloging past LPC Commissioners is a great idea and a necessary pursuit.  Perhaps a wiki would be a low-cost way to achieve this?  If not, maybe NYPAP will be able to work on this project at some point, or an independent preservationist will write a grant and pursue this.  </p>
<p>However this list is hopefully and eventually compiled, and as Tony Wood said, it would be a valuable record of the past, not to mention an instructive guide in anticipating the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

